Manual transfers determine cycle time
Map operation times, waiting times and bottlenecks to identify actions suited to automation.
Talk to an Engineer
01 / SOLUTIONS
Explore applications, system modules and implementation boundaries—from manual transfers and dedicated machining to connected equipment.
01 / FIND YOUR SOLUTION
Choose a discipline to explore its applications, processes and configurations.
01 / CUSTOM AUTOMATION
Start with a repetitive task. Map loading, positioning, execution and inspection, then assess the right scope for a standalone machine or connected stations.
Map operation times, waiting times and bottlenecks to identify actions suited to automation.
Separate positioning, error-proofing, execution conditions and inspection decisions to define what triggers each action.
Distinguish fixed structures from interchangeable parts and discuss fixtures, recipes and changeover early.
Modules are combined around project requirements.
Evaluate operator assistance, trays or dedicated feeders against part orientation, surface requirements and incoming material presentation.
Design assembly actions, station timing and transfer methods together, accounting for interference, accessibility and maintenance space.
Define checks for missing parts, incorrect assembly, positioning and key process states, with clear responses to faults.
Define manual, automatic and setup modes, including recipe selection, fixture changes and fault recovery.
PROCESS EXAMPLE
Automation level, station count, changeover and inspection are assessed against samples and processes. This example is not a fixed product configuration.
02 / PRECISION MACHINING
Use part features and the machining route to discuss datums, workholding, operation sequence and handling, then define the problem dedicated equipment must solve.
Review datum changes, clamping directions and contact points, and define how to verify positioning repeatability.
Analyze handling, cleaning, tool changes and inspection separately to identify actions that can run in parallel or off-machine.
Review fixture interfaces, access to wear parts, chip removal and cleaning space with daily maintenance in mind.
Modules are combined around project requirements.
Select datums and clamping methods based on material, geometry and cutting forces—not clamping force alone.
Assess motion, travel and tool clearance against process needs, checking rigidity, interference and machining access.
Consider loading orientation, surface protection, process coordination and chips, with clear boundaries between operator and machine tasks.
Distinguish machine-state checks from part measurement. Agree measurement methods and acceptance samples against the drawing.
PROCESS EXAMPLE
Accuracy, cycle time and size range depend on the part, process and inspection conditions. They cannot be inferred from concept images.
03 / SMART INTEGRATION
Review existing equipment and interfaces, then define sequences, signal meanings and data uses to connect status acquisition with fault response.
Agree start, complete, entry-permission and fault signals so upstream and downstream systems interpret states consistently.
Organize alarms by action conditions, identifying the source, impact, acknowledgement and recovery requirements.
Define why data is recorded before linking part IDs, timestamps, operations and results.
Modules are combined around project requirements.
Identify required states and measurements, then check signal sources, update rates and acquisition conditions.
Define modes, sequences, interlocks and fault branches, including conditions for resuming or re-homing after a stop.
Organize machine overviews, process states, parameters and alarms so operators can identify the next action.
Define fields, read/write directions, recording rates and disconnect handling, with agreed boundaries for existing systems.
PROCESS EXAMPLE
Communication methods, control platforms and data scope depend on an on-site interface review. Retrofitting existing equipment requires a separate feasibility assessment.
02 / PROJECT DELIVERABLES
Agree scope and deliverables before the project starts to guide reviews, manufacturing and acceptance.
Align the objectives
Develop the concept into a design
Verify agreed operating conditions
This is a framework for discussing delivery scope. Documents, training and on-site support are subject to the project agreement.
03 / BEFORE WE START
Yes. Part photographs, current operations, improvement goals and target output can support an initial discussion. Drawings or samples will still be needed for structural, machining and inspection assessments.
Begin with bottlenecks, upstream/downstream cycle times and product-change frequency. A developing process may suit phased implementation. Defined interfaces allow a closer assessment of connected stations.
First review space, signals, control interfaces, documentation and retrofit restrictions. Then define what to retain, modify or add. Equipment names alone cannot establish integration scope.
Parts, processes, configuration, acceptance conditions and delivery scope must first be defined. Cycle-time calculations should state whether loading, changeover and inspection are included.